Yes, you and Carl are right about cowardly behavior but you don't seem to want to know why white men became such cowards in the first place. They certainly weren't before WWII. You might want to look into the Civil Rights Movement of the 50s and 60s, women's liberation, the Cold War (please read Frances Stoner Saunders', The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters), and the rise of the sacred victim, entitled parasite culture™.
Another point. I'm surprised neither you nor Carl mention America First Legal, an organization (founded by Stephen Miller currently working at the White House and who has to live at an army base because of threats to his family) that has been suing institutions for race-based, un-Constitutional bias. They could use some money.
Ah I should have mentioned AFL. They do good work. I was, however, trying to focus more on the personal level
Carl and I spoke a good bit about the CRA when he came on the podcast. Again, though, I was trying to focus more on the somewhat more recent DEI stuff, which kicked in somewhat later
Thanks. Even on a personal level is it wise to alienate possible allies by grandstanding (not you) about being oh-so brave? Most men don't think of themselves as cowards but simply rationalize their behavior as being high status and not evil racist, sexist, homophobic, etc.
I knew a guy who fought in both WWII and Korea who went with the flow at IBM. Men want to conform and fit into the middle of the herd. Even otherwise brave men because it's strategically advantageous. The outliers get picked off. That's basic human tribal nature probably starting a couple of hundred thousand years ago.
If you enforce a policy, you make that policy yours more fully than the people who authored the policy.
I don't care if you are an airline employee or a cop or a soldier or a DEI NAZI in a corporation.
When you enforce it, YOU are responsible.
All collaborators must hang. Fed employees like TSA, who violate 4th Amendment Rights of millions of citizens each month, or DEI NAZIs at a university or the HR Bitches... if you push the policy, you make it yours and YOU MUST PAY THE PRICE FOR YOUR EVIL.
I agree that DEI enablers and collaborators should bear consequences for their deeds. I would not chase every file-and-rank complicit academic who kept his head down and did not speak up against these gross injustices, but I would make sure that administrators--such as DEI supportive deans, provosts, and presidents--are fired from their jobs and that the DEI track record is checked for new administrative hires.
On a positive side -- not everyone was complicit. You can find examples of resistance here:
Your essay is spot on, explains so much, and my organization is a case study. BTW, while I love the British accent just not in a reader, which sounds robotic
Did you listen to the audio version I record? Or the one Substack does automatically? I don’t have a British accent, so that might be the ai thing substack does
I’ve come to the gradual and sad realization that the DEI collaborators cannot and will not be my friends. Unfortunately that means I’ve lost many friends over the past four or five years, ever since the DEI stuff got really insane. I have nothing in common with these people.
These people are the same ones that cheered when Charlie Kirk was murdered, forced masks on preschoolers, proudly discriminated against whites in college admissions and mandated pronouns in bio. In most cases these commissars will not change their minds. As a result we only have one option, to tar and feather them until they repent.
I work in big tech and serve on a board at a local public university, both areas where people that think like us are in a minority. Unfortunately in environments like these, the tar and feather strategy is not get feasible. I feel like I’m living in Vichy France still; the allies have not yet reached our borders. Given that, what advice do you have for people like me who are still trying to subvert the subversion?
The reason this author, Jacob Savage, is incapable of fully reckoning with the plight of the White millennial is that he is an unrepentant leftist Jew. He has pathological blinders impairing his ability to wholly acknowledge White dispossession. For all the valid points he does indeed make, he will never totally expose the evil rot within our politics, but more importantly, lay out an actionable plan to prosecute the perpetrators to effectively prevent it from happening again; in effect, his article cleverly acts as a bit of a limited hangout pressure release valve to calm the ever-rising tide of White racial awareness.
Middle eastern identifying men like Hanania are attempting to distance themselves from white men because they don't wabt the association with a declining group.
Unlike when Don Rickles turned to the black guy on the podium during a nationally televised "roast" of I think Dean Martin in the early 70s and said, "You need us we don't need you" and got a laugh.
Yes, you and Carl are right about cowardly behavior but you don't seem to want to know why white men became such cowards in the first place. They certainly weren't before WWII. You might want to look into the Civil Rights Movement of the 50s and 60s, women's liberation, the Cold War (please read Frances Stoner Saunders', The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters), and the rise of the sacred victim, entitled parasite culture™.
Another point. I'm surprised neither you nor Carl mention America First Legal, an organization (founded by Stephen Miller currently working at the White House and who has to live at an army base because of threats to his family) that has been suing institutions for race-based, un-Constitutional bias. They could use some money.
Ah I should have mentioned AFL. They do good work. I was, however, trying to focus more on the personal level
Carl and I spoke a good bit about the CRA when he came on the podcast. Again, though, I was trying to focus more on the somewhat more recent DEI stuff, which kicked in somewhat later
Thanks. Even on a personal level is it wise to alienate possible allies by grandstanding (not you) about being oh-so brave? Most men don't think of themselves as cowards but simply rationalize their behavior as being high status and not evil racist, sexist, homophobic, etc.
I knew a guy who fought in both WWII and Korea who went with the flow at IBM. Men want to conform and fit into the middle of the herd. Even otherwise brave men because it's strategically advantageous. The outliers get picked off. That's basic human tribal nature probably starting a couple of hundred thousand years ago.
exactly why taking back the institutions is so important
If you enforce a policy, you make that policy yours more fully than the people who authored the policy.
I don't care if you are an airline employee or a cop or a soldier or a DEI NAZI in a corporation.
When you enforce it, YOU are responsible.
All collaborators must hang. Fed employees like TSA, who violate 4th Amendment Rights of millions of citizens each month, or DEI NAZIs at a university or the HR Bitches... if you push the policy, you make it yours and YOU MUST PAY THE PRICE FOR YOUR EVIL.
I agree that DEI enablers and collaborators should bear consequences for their deeds. I would not chase every file-and-rank complicit academic who kept his head down and did not speak up against these gross injustices, but I would make sure that administrators--such as DEI supportive deans, provosts, and presidents--are fired from their jobs and that the DEI track record is checked for new administrative hires.
On a positive side -- not everyone was complicit. You can find examples of resistance here:
https://hxstem.substack.com/p/fighting-the-good-fight-in-an-age
This essay also touches upon common excuses of inaction.
Your essay is spot on, explains so much, and my organization is a case study. BTW, while I love the British accent just not in a reader, which sounds robotic
Did you listen to the audio version I record? Or the one Substack does automatically? I don’t have a British accent, so that might be the ai thing substack does
This is exceptional.
Thank you!
Very similar to what I found in my own explorations on the death of DEI. It's, foundationally, a bad system made worse by the zealotry it's enforced.
https://www.polymathicbeing.com/p/the-death-of-diversity-and-inclusion
I’ve come to the gradual and sad realization that the DEI collaborators cannot and will not be my friends. Unfortunately that means I’ve lost many friends over the past four or five years, ever since the DEI stuff got really insane. I have nothing in common with these people.
These people are the same ones that cheered when Charlie Kirk was murdered, forced masks on preschoolers, proudly discriminated against whites in college admissions and mandated pronouns in bio. In most cases these commissars will not change their minds. As a result we only have one option, to tar and feather them until they repent.
I work in big tech and serve on a board at a local public university, both areas where people that think like us are in a minority. Unfortunately in environments like these, the tar and feather strategy is not get feasible. I feel like I’m living in Vichy France still; the allies have not yet reached our borders. Given that, what advice do you have for people like me who are still trying to subvert the subversion?
copy the French Resistance tactics
The reason this author, Jacob Savage, is incapable of fully reckoning with the plight of the White millennial is that he is an unrepentant leftist Jew. He has pathological blinders impairing his ability to wholly acknowledge White dispossession. For all the valid points he does indeed make, he will never totally expose the evil rot within our politics, but more importantly, lay out an actionable plan to prosecute the perpetrators to effectively prevent it from happening again; in effect, his article cleverly acts as a bit of a limited hangout pressure release valve to calm the ever-rising tide of White racial awareness.
Simple as.
You wouldn't want to trust your enemy's plan. If an enemy is fighting within, good.
I just found out, but it seems Savage isn't white. He's probably middle eastern:
https://thecarousel.substack.com/p/jacob-savage
Middle eastern identifying men like Hanania are attempting to distance themselves from white men because they don't wabt the association with a declining group.
Unlike when Don Rickles turned to the black guy on the podium during a nationally televised "roast" of I think Dean Martin in the early 70s and said, "You need us we don't need you" and got a laugh.
EEVIL