just make sure the "liberals" don't brainwash your children; keep them out of public schools and either send them to trade school or a college like Hillsdale/Ralston where tradition and family values still matter
Another tack one can take is to actively inoculate them to liberalism from an early age, with measured exposure to the virus going hand in hand with explanation and context. This approach allows families to survive and thrive even in deep blue zones. “That’s how they do it, but we think a different way in this family”.
Nature healing itself- “So, there is a large, positive feedback loop for the right that seems to be playing out in real time in which the furthest right produces the most children and genetically pulls the white population ever further to the right. That loop is still in its infancy, relatively speaking, but is already present and growing in intensity.”
Although I worry it's a problem that we'll have fewer utter cynics and depressives. Also the reason Malthusianism didn't stop me is because I'm low conscientiousness. May be many such cases.
Many childless cat ladies may have been perfectly fine wives and mothers in different conditions. I'm suspicious of over-attribution to genetics when the social pressure and malincentives are so immense.
I don’t recall mentioning anything about genetics, nevertheless, if feminism had not taken sway, you’re right, they probably would have been normal women.
I think population shrinking is like a planet filter. Corrupt, who lost lost primary virtues, stop reproducing, and only family-oriented, stronger people persist and reform the whole society. If a nation is willing to patiently survive this, like Britain, it will reach new heights. If they try to fix the problem with foreigners, they will go extinct like the Romans. Powerful article!
Sorry don't have time at moment to read the whole but just realize the left has access to the means of reproduction ie the frankentube (IVF) and the will to use it en masse (heard of the chicom "gentlemen" commissioning thousand of test tube surrogate babies right here in USA?)
You're inventing a Crisis, out of thin air and overheated rhetoric.
You realize that the Minimum Viable Population for vertebrate species is, as a rule of thumb, calculated in the thousands, yes? Not the hundreds of millions, or the millions, or the hundreds of thousands, or tens of thousands. Thousands. Four figures.
And you get that any drop in population (or subpopulation) to a minimum that exceeds a number like 10,000 by a factor of 100- that is, 1 million- is at minimal risk of reducing genetic diversity to any meaningful extent, hmm?
What do you mean, "no"? You don't get that?
Consider the example of the Japanese, an island people often used as an example of one of the most homogenous genotypical populations on the planet.* Even if the population of Japanese drops by 99% over the next 75 years, that still leaves a population of 1.2 million: more than enough genomic diversity to preserve the "signature genetic diversity" of the "Japanese phenotype", or what have you. (Applying the 99% drop over 4-5 generations to the Korean population would yield about 750,000 Koreans in the year 2100, given that the combined population of the DRPK and ROK is over 75 million.)
Because a population bottleneck isn't about a percentage decline. It's about absolute numbers.
So what's with sky-is-falling panic propaganda about White Europeans- a subpopulation aggregate that--even at its most strictly defined--presently outnumbers the Japanese (currently 120 million) several times over?
Isn't avoiding resource depletion and cleaning up the currently rampant toxics pollution more of a priority for maintaining the common health and welfare of the human population- or, fuck, have it your way, populations- of the planet? How about avoiding nuclear war? Isn't that a higher priority?
I can comprehend an Ainu person concerned with maintaining the integrity of their "unique tribal genetic diversity" being worried about the prospect of a genetic bottleneck. The population of Ainu is estimated at less than 120,000 people. But the idea that the aggregation of Europeans informally termed "Whites" is facing a "genetic bottleneck" is ludicrous.
Readers with a serious scholarly interest in population genetics, dynamics, kinship coefficients, etc. might consider reviewing studies of a northern European subgroup of a similar size to the Ainu population: American Anabaptists, mostly Mennonite and Amish, who "have long been of interest to geneticists because they have remained mostly closed and inbred, and because they maintain detailed genealogies (McKusick 1978)." The studied population base presently comprising around 80,000, with genealogies going back several generations. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11832144_Towards_a_Complete_North_American_Anabaptist_Genealogy_II_Analysis_of_Inbreeding
Ignoring any moral problems, of which I think there are some, I think the cost to effective parenting that allows kids to resist the propaganda pressures more than outweighs the potential benefits of producing more progeny
You arent going to beat a genetic bottleneck thats environment-bound. All you merely have to do is sit still in america and you will brown or be overrun by browns. its the consequence of colonialism - the earth devours you regardless.
just make sure the "liberals" don't brainwash your children; keep them out of public schools and either send them to trade school or a college like Hillsdale/Ralston where tradition and family values still matter
Another tack one can take is to actively inoculate them to liberalism from an early age, with measured exposure to the virus going hand in hand with explanation and context. This approach allows families to survive and thrive even in deep blue zones. “That’s how they do it, but we think a different way in this family”.
Nature healing itself- “So, there is a large, positive feedback loop for the right that seems to be playing out in real time in which the furthest right produces the most children and genetically pulls the white population ever further to the right. That loop is still in its infancy, relatively speaking, but is already present and growing in intensity.”
Although I worry it's a problem that we'll have fewer utter cynics and depressives. Also the reason Malthusianism didn't stop me is because I'm low conscientiousness. May be many such cases.
Thankfully, the childless cat ladies will not reproduce.
Many childless cat ladies may have been perfectly fine wives and mothers in different conditions. I'm suspicious of over-attribution to genetics when the social pressure and malincentives are so immense.
I don’t recall mentioning anything about genetics, nevertheless, if feminism had not taken sway, you’re right, they probably would have been normal women.
"Thankfully the childless will not reproduce" ..
It's often a good idea to read one's work aloud to oneself before publishing, boomer bot.
I think population shrinking is like a planet filter. Corrupt, who lost lost primary virtues, stop reproducing, and only family-oriented, stronger people persist and reform the whole society. If a nation is willing to patiently survive this, like Britain, it will reach new heights. If they try to fix the problem with foreigners, they will go extinct like the Romans. Powerful article!
Very well put, I generally agree!
Thank you!
Life always finds a way
Sorry don't have time at moment to read the whole but just realize the left has access to the means of reproduction ie the frankentube (IVF) and the will to use it en masse (heard of the chicom "gentlemen" commissioning thousand of test tube surrogate babies right here in USA?)
You're inventing a Crisis, out of thin air and overheated rhetoric.
You realize that the Minimum Viable Population for vertebrate species is, as a rule of thumb, calculated in the thousands, yes? Not the hundreds of millions, or the millions, or the hundreds of thousands, or tens of thousands. Thousands. Four figures.
And you get that any drop in population (or subpopulation) to a minimum that exceeds a number like 10,000 by a factor of 100- that is, 1 million- is at minimal risk of reducing genetic diversity to any meaningful extent, hmm?
What do you mean, "no"? You don't get that?
Consider the example of the Japanese, an island people often used as an example of one of the most homogenous genotypical populations on the planet.* Even if the population of Japanese drops by 99% over the next 75 years, that still leaves a population of 1.2 million: more than enough genomic diversity to preserve the "signature genetic diversity" of the "Japanese phenotype", or what have you. (Applying the 99% drop over 4-5 generations to the Korean population would yield about 750,000 Koreans in the year 2100, given that the combined population of the DRPK and ROK is over 75 million.)
Because a population bottleneck isn't about a percentage decline. It's about absolute numbers.
So what's with sky-is-falling panic propaganda about White Europeans- a subpopulation aggregate that--even at its most strictly defined--presently outnumbers the Japanese (currently 120 million) several times over?
Isn't avoiding resource depletion and cleaning up the currently rampant toxics pollution more of a priority for maintaining the common health and welfare of the human population- or, fuck, have it your way, populations- of the planet? How about avoiding nuclear war? Isn't that a higher priority?
I can comprehend an Ainu person concerned with maintaining the integrity of their "unique tribal genetic diversity" being worried about the prospect of a genetic bottleneck. The population of Ainu is estimated at less than 120,000 people. But the idea that the aggregation of Europeans informally termed "Whites" is facing a "genetic bottleneck" is ludicrous.
Readers with a serious scholarly interest in population genetics, dynamics, kinship coefficients, etc. might consider reviewing studies of a northern European subgroup of a similar size to the Ainu population: American Anabaptists, mostly Mennonite and Amish, who "have long been of interest to geneticists because they have remained mostly closed and inbred, and because they maintain detailed genealogies (McKusick 1978)." The studied population base presently comprising around 80,000, with genealogies going back several generations. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11832144_Towards_a_Complete_North_American_Anabaptist_Genealogy_II_Analysis_of_Inbreeding
[*although, wouldn't you know: https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2024/10/11/the-japanese-population-isnt-as-genetically-homogenous-as-everyone-thinks/ ]
Nothing you say counts for shit.
Will, you have to at least give it up to the Math in that post.
No.
What do you think of having multiple babymams as a strategy?
Ignoring any moral problems, of which I think there are some, I think the cost to effective parenting that allows kids to resist the propaganda pressures more than outweighs the potential benefits of producing more progeny
Your kids will live in Elon’s mines. Some victory
You arent going to beat a genetic bottleneck thats environment-bound. All you merely have to do is sit still in america and you will brown or be overrun by browns. its the consequence of colonialism - the earth devours you regardless.
If you f**k, you will stop being active on social media. Especially if you get baby mama drama.
You’re A BAPNigger.
I Got married in April, so moving in that direction!
Congratulations!
Something took with my kids. 8 grands here!