In a sense more superficial than wiser agricultural land usage by Americans, nevertheless, arguably still very critically important could be state constraints upon what body politic is actually employed in the existing service sector simulacra. It's a symptom not root cause, that most "middle management" in the digital economy has been offshored. But if I'm a resident of Arizona or citizen of Texas then when I contact service/support of any sort, I want that live agent to be a local / regional American in America. It's a fairly narrow brush; would help redirect the wealth extractive corporate policies more in favor of American economy and workers, and would be politically hazardous law to oppose.
I agree 100% with the article and was impressed by the quality of the writing but I am skeptical any of this will happen voluntarily. Wealth of the kind we seek to promote has its drawbacks, which is why it's been largely abandoned by our top 0.01%. It's quite a tall order to get many wealthy people to start the kind of projects we're looking for out of the goodness of their hearts, losing some of their liquidity for the sake of others. But when it happens, we should sing their praises to the moon. Thanks for shouting out Willinks company, I'll definitely check out their products.
The best example of the kind of pro-social wealth we are looking for that I can think of is Musks purchase of Twitter. He bought a failing company that was not commercially viable bc he believed in the power of a free public online square. And God bless him for doing it bc we really needed one in those days when Bidens government was publicly scheming to put out propaganda in the name of fighting "misinformation". He didn't have to do it, and he got tons of flack for it.
In a sense more superficial than wiser agricultural land usage by Americans, nevertheless, arguably still very critically important could be state constraints upon what body politic is actually employed in the existing service sector simulacra. It's a symptom not root cause, that most "middle management" in the digital economy has been offshored. But if I'm a resident of Arizona or citizen of Texas then when I contact service/support of any sort, I want that live agent to be a local / regional American in America. It's a fairly narrow brush; would help redirect the wealth extractive corporate policies more in favor of American economy and workers, and would be politically hazardous law to oppose.
Agreed. Great point
I agree 100% with the article and was impressed by the quality of the writing but I am skeptical any of this will happen voluntarily. Wealth of the kind we seek to promote has its drawbacks, which is why it's been largely abandoned by our top 0.01%. It's quite a tall order to get many wealthy people to start the kind of projects we're looking for out of the goodness of their hearts, losing some of their liquidity for the sake of others. But when it happens, we should sing their praises to the moon. Thanks for shouting out Willinks company, I'll definitely check out their products.
The best example of the kind of pro-social wealth we are looking for that I can think of is Musks purchase of Twitter. He bought a failing company that was not commercially viable bc he believed in the power of a free public online square. And God bless him for doing it bc we really needed one in those days when Bidens government was publicly scheming to put out propaganda in the name of fighting "misinformation". He didn't have to do it, and he got tons of flack for it.
Thanks! Yeah I need to do an article on some realistic ways of starting to encourage this, and some more examples